![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
|
Print Chapter 7 (PDF 118KB) | < - Report Home < - Chapter 6 : Chapter 8 - > |
Introduction
Issues concerning on-going professional learning
Building an evidence-based approach to pedagogy
Introduction |
|
7.1 | On-going professional learning is a vital part of the teacher education continuum. Teachers need to stay up to date with developments in the knowledge base in their discipline areas as well as with developments in corresponding pedagogical approaches. As they progress through their careers, teachers will be challenged by situations or student needs that warrant new learning on their part. In undertaking professional learning, and incorporating that learning into their practice, teachers are also generating new knowledge. There is a dynamic relationship between teaching, learning and research. The vigour of this relationship is in some respects an indicator of the quality and health of teaching at any point in time. |
7.2 | On-going professional learning is a shared responsibility. Employing authorities and schools clearly have primary responsibility for ensuring that teachers have access to quality on-going professional learning. Much of the on-going professional learning that is driven by employing authorities relates to curriculum developments or other specific priorities. Schools and principals also have responsibility for ensuring that teachers have access to on-going professional learning and for working with teachers to identify appropriate on-going professional learning programs. As professionals, teachers have particular responsibility to ensure that they stay up to date with developments in their field and to continue to invest time and effort in learning. Through sharing their learning with others, either through participating in research or through informal collegiate support mechanisms, teachers are able to build a culture of learning that should be the hallmark of the teaching profession. |
7.3 | The Australian Government makes a significant contribution to on-going professional learning. The principle vehicle for its contribution is the Australian Government Quality Teaching Program (AGQTP) which aims to update and improve teachers’ skills and understanding in priority areas and to enhance the status of teaching. The Australian Government’s investment in the program for the period 1999-2009 amounts to almost $300 million. Since the program began, more than 240,000 professional development opportunities have been taken up by teachers.1 A recent evaluation highlighted its effectiveness and noted “that there is a continuing imperative for a single national program that focuses explicitly on teacher and school leader professional learning needs to address contemporary and emerging challenges in Australian schooling.”2 The committee commends the Australian Government’s support of the professional learning of teachers and school leaders. It encourages the Australian Government to continue this level of support over the long term including its support of Teaching Australia which is funded under the AGQTP. |
![]() |
|
Issues concerning on-going professional learning |
|
7.4 | A number of issues concerning on-going professional learning were raised in this inquiry. These include: a decline in the number of teachers interested in postgraduate study which has been attributed to: the introduction of fees for postgraduate study; the increase in teachers’ workloads; the ageing of the teaching workforce3; the lack of financial reward for gaining post graduate qualifications4; and the perception that further study was not linked to career advancement5;
|
7.5 | Developing stronger partnerships between employing authorities, universities and schools is potentially a key mechanism for addressing many of these issues and there are many examples of collaborative ventures in this area. The establishment of the National Teacher Education Partnership Fund recommended in Chapter 5 would encourage many initiatives to develop, provide and deliver effective on-going professional learning. |
7.6 | As professionals, teachers should be committed to on-going professional learning and this expectation should be formalised as a requirement for the renewal of registration. (The committee notes that some jurisdictions have introduced such a requirement and others are moving towards it.) Moreover, the expectation that teachers participate in on-going professional development should be coupled with systemic recognition of the value of on-going professional learning. In particular, participation in substantial on-going learning should be recognised as one of the ways of achieving higher levels of registration. Ways should also be found to recognise the private efforts of teachers to develop their expertise and salary advancement or loadings attached to higher levels of registration should be considered. |
7.7 | Many submissions highlighted the potential of the national professional standards for teaching to provide a means of linking on-going professional learning to career progression. This is evidence of the readiness of the profession to adopt a standards-based approach to teacher registration and to career-long teacher professional learning.
|
Recommendation 8
|
|
![]() |
|
Building an evidence-based approach to pedagogy |
|
7.8 | The location of initial teacher education in universities should promote a strong relationship between research into teaching and learning and practice. Many universities and other stakeholders described ventures in which universities are conducting research in partnership with education authorities. In some cases they are also developing and offering related on-going professional learning. The committee encourages these developments and notes again the potential for the National Teacher Education Partnership Fund that it has recommended in Chapter 5 to deliver benefits in this area. |
7.9 | Despite some instances of universities collaborating with other stakeholders in areas of research and on-going professional learning, the committee remains concerned that much of the educational research that is being done in Australia does not find its way into teaching practice. Teaching Australia confirmed the committee’s impression and outlined its intention to develop a mechanism for making relevant research more accessible.
|
7.10 | The committee strongly supports Teaching Australia’s expressed intention in this area. Improving access to current relevant research would enrich the formal and informal on-going professional learning opportunities available to teachers. A National Clearing House for Educational Research would be of considerable benefit to all teachers but has the potential to be particularly so for teachers in rural and remote locations. There is also potential to link research available through the proposed National Clearing House for Educational Research to the development of specific on-line professional learning modules. |
Recommendation 9
|
|
Conclusion |
|
7.11 | The committee was fortunate enough in the course of this inquiry to meet with a number of teacher education students and recent graduates. Some of these students and graduates had entered teacher education straight from school. Others had entered teacher education from different careers or from family caring responsibilities. Without exception, the students impressed the committee with their commitment, their professionalism and the value that they placed on teaching. |
7.12 | Ultimately the effectiveness of the initiatives to improve research and on-going learning, and the relationship between them, will depend on how fully teachers embrace a commitment to on-going professional learning as part of their professional identity. The following observation from the University of Wollongong confirms the impression that the committee gained through its own meetings with students and beginning teachers, and augurs well for the future.
|
1 | Department of Education, Science and Training, Submission No. 59, p. 10. Back |
2 | Department of Education, Science and Training, Submission No. 59, p. 10. Back |
3 |
See, for example: University of South Australia, Submission No. 40, pp. 7-8. Back |
4 | See, for example: Australian Council of State School Organisations, Submission No. 143, p. 11; Flinders University , Submission No. 126, p. 13. Back |
5 | See , for example: Mr Barry Kissane, School of Education, Murdoch University, Transcript of Evidence, 25 October 2005, p. 17; Ms Susanne Owens, Teacher Registration Board of South Australia, Transcript of Evidence, 29 September 2005, p. 13. Back |
6 | See, for example: University of South Australia, Submission No. 40, pp. 7-8; Flinders University, Submission No. 126, p. 13; Mr John Sarev, Teacher Registration Board of the Northern Territory, Transcript of Evidence, 31 August 2005, p .25. Ms Glynys O’Brien, South Australian Primary Principals Association, Transcript of Evidence, 27 September 2005, p. 77; Ms Susanne Owens, Teachers Registration Board of South Australia, Transcript of Evidence, 29 September 2005, p. 13. Back |
7 | See, for example: Fostering in Health & Education Partnerships, Submission No. 11, p. 6. Back |
8 | See, for example: Association of Independent Schools of SA, Submission No. 122, p. 19. Back |
9 | See, for example: Teachers Registration Board of South Australia , Submission No. 38, p. 5; Flinders University Submission No. 126, p. 13. Back |
10 | See, for example: Flinders University, Submission No. 126, p. 13. Back |
11 | See, for example: Fostering in Health & Education Partnerships, Submission No. 11, p. 6. Back |
12 | Connell Skilbeck International Education Research and Consultancy, Submission No. 24, pp. 9-10. Back |
13 | Department of Education, Science and Training, Submission No. 59, p. 20. Back |
14 | Hobart Forum on Teacher Education, Submission No. 171, p. 6. Back |
15 | University of Southern Queensland, Submission No. 146, p. 4. Back |
16 | South Australian Government, Submission No. 157, pp. 22-23. Back |
17 | Dr Michael Gaffney, Catholic Education Office, Archdiocese of Canberra and Goulburn, Transcript of Evidence, 30 March 2006, p. 1. Back |
18 | Prof. Stephen Dinham, University of Wollongong, Transcript of Evidence, ,4 April 2006, p. 52. Back |
19 | Teaching Australia, Submission No. 168, p. 12. Back |
20 | Prof. Stephen Dinham, University of Wollongong, Transcript of Evidence, 4 April 2006, p. 52. Back |
Print Chapter 7 (PDF 118KB) | < - Report Home < - Chapter 6 : Chapter 8 - > |