![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
|
Print Chapter 5 (PDF 139KB) | < - Report Home < - Chapter 4 : Chapter 6 - > |
Purpose
Obligations
Consultation
Costs
Entry into force and withdrawal
Implementation
Conclusion and recommendation
Purpose |
5.1 | The Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the United States of America on Cooperation in Science and Technology for Homeland/Domestic Security Matters (the Agreement) establishes a framework to encourage, develop and facilitate bilateral cooperative activities in science and technology.1 |
5.2 | These activities will contribute to the domestic security capabilities for the prevention, detection and response to a domestic security threat. This includes protection of critical infrastructure and consequence management for both Australia and the United States of America (US).2 The Agreement also builds upon the existing Australia-US relationship in science and technology, and provides economic benefits to Australia’s science and technology industry.3 |
5.3 | In addition, this Agreement complements the Agreement relating to scientific and technical cooperation with the US4 as it provides for the planning and undertaking of cooperative activities in science and technology relating to domestic security.5 The Agreement also strengthens Australia’s long-standing relationship with the US in the area of science and technology and enables Australian scientists and counter-terrorism agencies to benefit from collaborative research activities.6 |
5.4 | The Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C) outlined why the Agreement was of particular benefit to Australia:
|
5.5 | PM&C elaborated on the types of cooperative activities that could be undertaken under the Agreement.
|
5.6 | PM&C also advised that Australia was interested in entering into similar agreements with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Canada. There is also the possibility of entering into an agreement between four or more parties.9 |
![]() |
|
Obligations |
|
5.7 | Australia’s obligations under the Agreement are:
|
![]() |
|
Consultation |
|
5.8 | Consultation was undertaken with representatives from the Departments of Defence; Foreign Affairs and Trade; Education, Science and Training; Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry; Health; Transport and Regional Services; and the Attorney-General’s Department. Representatives from the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet; Defence and the Attorney-General’s Department participated in the negotiation of the Agreement. The Australian Government Solicitor provided the legal counsel on the drafting of the Agreement.25 |
5.9 | The Australian Government consulted with State and Territory Governments through the Commonwealth-State/Territory Standing Committee on Treaties (SCOT). A verbal briefing on the Agreement was provided at the 22 September 2005 SCOT meeting. No objections or concerns were raised by State or Territory Governments as a result of this briefing.26 In addition, consultation was undertaken with State water, fire brigade and police.27 |
5.10 | The Defence, Science and Technology Organisation was consulted throughout the development of the treaty text and considered the Agreement as a useful addition to other defence arrangements. CSIRO28 legal officers examined the intellectual property clauses in August/September 2005 and supported the Agreement as a useful arrangement to facilitate interactions with the US.29 |
![]() |
|
Costs |
|
5.11 | There are no financial obligations directly associated with the implementation of this Agreement. The Agreement provides the opportunity for the co-funding of collaborative projects with the US. The US has in excess of $100 million to support scientific research in this area.30 |
5.12 | Under the Agreement, PM&C representatives will oversee the implementation of the Agreement and attend joint meetings with the United States Department of Homeland Security. These costs will be met through PM&C’s budget.31 |
Entry into force and withdrawal |
|
5.13 | The Agreement will enter into force upon the exchange of diplomatic notes. The Agreement was signed on 21 December 2005. Provisional application of the Agreement has been facilitated through an exchange of diplomatic notes at the time of the signing of the Agreement. This allows both parties to commence on a number of time critical activities prior to the Agreement’s entry into force. The Agreement will not be legally binding until all domestic procedures have taken place.32 |
5.14 | The Agreement may be terminated in writing by either Party and would take effect 6 months from the date of the written notice, or by the mutual written agreement of the Parties.33 |
![]() |
|
Implementation |
|
5.15 | All manner of exchange between Parties in relation to this Agreement are to be conducted in accordance with the applicable laws of each Party. There will be no change to existing legislation as a result of the Agreement.34 |
Conclusion and recommendation |
|
5.16 | The Committee acknowledges that the Agreement will enable Australian scientists and counter terrorism agencies to benefit from collaborative research activities and strengthen Australia’s relationship in the area of science and technology. |
Recommendation 4
|
1 | National Interest Analysis (NIA), paras 7 and 13. Back |
2 | NIA, para. 4. Back |
3 | NIA, paras 5 and 6. Back |
4 | The Agreement relating to Scientific and Technical Cooperation between the Government of Australia and the Government of the United States of America (Canberra, 28 February 2006) was automatically referred to the Committee upon its tabling on 20 June 2006. Back |
5 | NIA, para. 12. Back |
6 | NIA, para. 6. Back |
7 | Dr Richard Davis , Transcript of Evidence, 19 June 2006 , p. 10. Back |
8 | Dr Richard Davis , Transcript of Evidence, 19 June 2006 , p. 11. Back |
9 | Dr Richard Davis , Transcript of Evidence, 19 June 2006 , p. 15. Back |
10 | NIA, para. 14. Back |
11 | NIA, para. 15. Back |
12 | NIA, para. 16. Back |
13 | NIA, para. 17. Back |
14 | NIA, para. 18. Back |
15 | NIA, para. 19. Back |
16 | NIA, para. 20. Back |
17 | NIA, para. 20. Back |
18 | NIA, para. 20. Back |
19 | NIA, para. 23. Back |
20 | NIA, para. 21. Back |
21 | NIA, para. 24. Back |
22 | NIA, para. 24. Back |
23 | NIA, para. 25. Back |
24 | NIA, para. 26. Back |
25 | Consultation Annex, para. 2. Back |
26 | Consultation Annex, para. 4. Back |
27 | Dr Richard Davis , Transcript of Evidence, 19 June 2006 , p. 12. Back |
28 | Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Back |
29 | Consultation Annex, para. 5. Back |
30 | NIA, para. 28. Back |
31 | NIA, para. 29. Back |
32 | NIA, para. 3. Back |
33 | NIA, para. 32. Back |
Print Chapter 5 (PDF 139KB) | < - Report Home < - Chapter 4 : Chapter 6 - > |