|
Footnotes
Chapter 1 Introduction
[1]
Australia, House of Representatives 2008, Votes and Proceedings, No.
64, p. 740; Australia, Senate 2008, Journal, No. 47, p. 1297.
[2]
Australia, House of Representatives 2008, Votes and Proceedings, No.
69, p. 793; Australia, Senate 2009, Journal, No. 53, p. 1480.
[3]
The Committee’s review of the proposed treaty actions was advertised in The
Australian on 4 February 2009. Members of the public were advised on how to
obtain relevant information both in the advertisement and via the Committee’s
website, and invited to submit their views to the Committee.
Chapter 2 Agreement between the Government of Australia and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation on the Security of Information
[1]
National Interest Analysis (NIA), paras 1 & 2.
[2]
Mr Frank Roberts, Transcript of Evidence, 23 February 2009, p. 2.
[3]
Mr Frank Roberts, Transcript of Evidence, 23 February 2009, p. 2; NIA, para 11.
[4] NIA, para 12.
[5]
Ms Sandra Ragg, Transcript of Evidence, 23 February 2009, p. 2.
[6] NIA, para 13.
[7] NIA, para 15.
[8] NIA, para 16.
[9]
NIA, para 10.
[10]
Mr Frank Roberts, Transcript of Evidence, 23 February 2009, p. 1; Mr Peter West, Transcript of Evidence, 23 February 2009, p. 3.
[11]
NIA, para 6.
[12]
NIA, para 7. These countries are the US, Sweden, South Africa, Singapore,
New Zealand, Germany, France, Canada and Denmark.
[13] NIA, para 23.
[14]
Mr Frank Roberts, Transcript of Evidence, 23 February 2009, p. 2 & p. 4.
[15] NIA, para 24.
[16]
Ms Sandra Ragg, Transcript of Evidence, 23 February 2009, p. 5.
[17] NIA, para 17.
[18] NIA, para 20.
[19] NIA, para 21.
[20]
Mr Frank Roberts, Transcript of Evidence, 23 February 2009, p. 2; NIA, para 22.
[21] NIA, para 25.
[22] NIA, para 26.
|
|
