![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
Committee activities (inquiries and reports)Report of the Parliamentary Delegation to New Zealand: Australia-New Zealand Committee Exchange Program 27-31 August 2006
Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2006 0 642 78842 1 (printed version) 0 642 78843 X (HTML version) Contents
ForewordAustralia and New Zealand have a close and cooperative relationship. The relationship between the two countries at a government-to-government level, for example, is well developed and extensive. Ministers and government officials from both countries regularly participate in meetings on a wide range of issues. Australia and New Zealand also have close economic and trade ties. New Zealand is now Australia’s fifth largest market, while Australia is New Zealand’s principal trading partner. Thousands of Australians and New Zealanders also cross the Tasman each year as tourists, for business purposes or to visit family members. Against this background of cooperation and strong linkages between the two countries, I was honoured to lead the Joint Standing Committee on Migration delegation to New Zealand in August 2006 as part of the annual Committee Exchange program between the two parliaments . The delegation took the opportunity to examine New Zealand’s skilled migration program, as well as its overseas skills recognition process. This report provides some background on the program assembled for the visit and a brief comparative overview of migration arrangements in Australia and New Zealand. Over the course of the visit, several immigration related issues emerged that were of interest to the delegation. The report concludes with a discussion on these key points of interest. The visit to New Zealand was particularly timely given that, at the time , the Committee was finalising its inquiry into overseas skills recognition, upgrading and licensing. The terms of reference for the inquiry required the Committee to ‘consider how Australia’s arrangements compare with those of other major immigration countries’. New Zealand was one of the countries under examination. The Committee concluded its report, Negotiating the Maze: Review of Arrangements for Overseas Skills Recognition, Upgrading and Licensing, shortly after visiting New Zealand. The report was tabled in Parliament in September 2006. The delegation program was a busy and interesting one, providing a balance between formal meetings, and informal discussions and inspections. This provided us with an excellent overview of New Zealand’s migration system. On behalf of the delegation, I would like to thank the New Zealand Parliament and the Speaker of the House of Representatives of New Zealand, the Hon Margaret Wilson MP, for the hospitality extended to the delegation. Our visit coincided with a sitting week in the New Zealand Parliament and this provided us with a great opportunity to observe parliament in session. I would also like to thank the New Zealand parliamentarians, government and non-government officials, and peak ethnic groups with whom we met for the time they took to ensure that the delegation was well informed. Particular thanks go to our counterpart committees in New Zealand—the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee and the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee . The delegation very much appreciated the briefing they received from both committees. The Parliamentary Relations Office of the Australian Parliament coordinated arrangements in their usual efficient and professional way. In New Zealand, the high quality of support provided during our visit by Ms Ruth Delaney, Visit Manager, Department of Internal Affairs, was much appreciated. The Australian High Commission in New Zealand also provided support over the course of the visit, and our thanks go to His Excellency Mr John Dauth, Australian High Commissioner to New Zealand. Finally, I thank the other members of the delegation—Senator Linda Kirk, the Deputy Leader of the delegation; Mr Laurie Ferguson MP; and Senator Stephen Parry—for their active and constructive contribution to the delegation. Don Randall MP Chair Membership of the Committee
Membership of the Delegation
Visit objectives
List of abbreviations
Footnotes
![]()
| ![]() |