Skip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Joint CommitteePhoto of a Committes Meeting
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact



Joint Standing Committee on Public Works
Committee activities (inquiries and reports)

Operational Upgrade, Darwin Detention Facility, Berrimah , NT

Print Chapter 2 (PDF 70KB) < - Report Home < - Chapter 1 : Chapter 3 - >

Chapter 2 The Proposed Works

Purpose
Need
Options Considered
Scope
Project Delivery
Cost

Purpose

2.1

The purpose of the proposed work is to establish a safe and secure land-based detention facility for illegal foreign fishers (IFFs) apprehended in Australia’s northern waters.1

top  

Need

2.2

According to DIMIA, illegal foreign fishing in Australia’s northern waters has been increasing in recent years and this trend is expected to continue. In 2004-05, some 1,350 IFFs were apprehended – an increase of 425 on the 2002-03 figure. Most of those apprehended were Indonesian nationals; all were male and seven to nine per cent were minors. Around 340 – or 25 per cent – of the total were charged with fishing offences and 100 have served, or are serving, prison sentences.2

2.3

The Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) and DIMIA have statutory obligations to detain IFFs. AFMA may detain IFFs for up to seven days to investigate breaches of fisheries legislation, while DIMIA detains to establish the individual’s right to remain in Australia and to have individuals available for repatriation.3

2.4

At present, AFMA manages detention of IFFs on their vessels until investigation and charging. This arrangement is becoming increasingly difficult to manage and has been criticised by the Indonesian Consulate in Darwin, public scrutiny bodies and a Northern Territory coronial inquiry.4

2.5

In recognition of the difficulties associated with boat-based detention, the Government announced the operational upgrade of the existing contingency immigration detention facility at DEB in January 2005. It is intended that this facility will serve as the central detention facility for northern Australia and will be commissioned as a joint AFMA/DIMIA facility, pending the finalisation of a number of legal issues. It is envisaged that, in addition to IFFs, the facility will accommodate Northern Territory immigration compliance cases and unauthorised air arrivals, some of whom are women and children.5

top  

Options Considered

2.6

The northern compound of the existing contingency detention facility has been selected for upgrade because:

  • it contains the largest grassed outdoor recreation area; and
  • it has a greater amount of space for construction of the additional buildings required to operate the facility on an ongoing basis.6
top  

Scope

2.7

To meet AFMA and DIMIA operational requirements, it is proposed that the northern compound of existing contingency immigration detention accommodation at DEB will be upgraded to serve as a permanent detention centre. In order for the detention service provider (DSP) to meet the requirements of the Immigration Detention Standards (IDS), a range of new and additional facilities are required, including:

  • additional buildings or modification of existing demountables to support delivery of IDS;7
  • refurbishment of existing administration building;8
  • provision of improved amenity and safety for detainees, including illumination of pathways, cyclone provisions and recreational equipment;9
  • improved security, including monitoring and additional fencing;10 and
  • upgrade and modification of existing site services.11
top  

Project Delivery

2.8

DIMIA’s main submission states that

…subject to Government approval, DIMIA proposes to procure the buildings and infrastructure in accordance with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines.12

No specific information on the proposed project delivery mechanism is provided.

2.9

DIMIA intends that the facility should be operational by mid 2006.13

top  

Cost

2.10

DIMIA estimates the cost of the proposed work to be $8.215 million, based on “preliminary design work”.14


top

Footnotes

1 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 1Back
2 ibid, paragraphs 6 - 8 Back
3 ibid, paragraph 11 Back
4 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraphs 2 – 5 and 12 - 13 Back
5 ibid, paragraphs 15 - 18 Back
6 ibid, paragraph 31 Back
7 ibid, paragraphs 58a and 59 - 90 Back
8 Appendix C, Submission No. 1, paragraph 58b Back
9 ibid, paragraphs 58c, 99 – 102 and 109 Back
10 ibid, paragraphs 58d and 103 - 108 Back
11 ibid, paragraphs 58e and 91 – 98 Back
12 ibid, paragraph 135 Back
13 ibid, paragraph 133 Back
14 ibid, paragraph 132 Back

Print Chapter 2 (PDF 70KB) < - Report Home < - Chapter 1 : Chapter 3 - >

top